Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ruocco v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1972Published

1Dissent

Munder, Acting P. J. (dissenting).

It is my view that the broad language of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law makes it applicable to this action for a declaratory judgment. That statute provides, in pertinent part, that “no action or special proceeding, for any cause whatever, except as hereinafter provided, relating to district property or claim against the district, or involving its rights or interestsshall be maintained unless a written verified claim is presented within three months after accrual and the officer or body having the power to “ adjust or pay ” such claim has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Schenker v. Village of LibertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Schenker v. Village of LibertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API