Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Carter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 20, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered January 2, 2008, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs claim of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage is insufficient as a matter of law because the allegations in the amended complaint fail to establish that defendant acted solely to harm plaintiff by unlawful means beyond mere self-interest or other economic considerations (Carvel Corp. v Noonan, 3 NY3d 182 [2004]; Jacobs v Continuum Health Partners, 7 AD3d 312 [2004]). The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Silverman v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Jacobs v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Manfredonia v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schoolcraft v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Yong Ki Hong v. KBS America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Sprecher v. ThibodeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Steinberg v. SchnappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sabharwal & Finkel, LLC v. SorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.