Legal Opinion

Perez v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 1999No. 98 Civ 5756 SASPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a medical malpractice action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because the acts of negligence alleged in the complaint took place at the Manhattan Veteran’s Administration Medical Center (“VAMC”), which is located in the Southern District of New York.

Plaintiffs’ claims were tried to the Court without a jury in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2402. Plaintiffs’ claims consisted of Raul Perez’s (“Perez”)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Molzof v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Laird v. NelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. K.R. ex rel. Perez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API