Legal Opinion

Lighton v. Madison-Onondaga Mutual Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this action to recover for a fire loss defendant insurers asserted the affirmative defense, inter alia, that plaintiffs had willfully concealed the fact that their property had been damaged by fires of a suspicious nature prior to the issuance of the policies. Following a trial, the jury, to whom special questions had been submitted by the court, determined that the defendants did not prove concealment but that they had proved that the fire was deliberately set. On this appeal plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sebring v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Sun Insurance v. Hercules Securities Unlimited, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Home Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Spectrum Information Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Retail Local 906 of AFL-CIO Welfare FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Putnam Resources v. PatemanDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API