Engstrand v. Kleffman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis .county against defendants, John Kleffman and Edward Kleffman, to recover $1,062.75 upon a foreign joint judgment. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law found that plaintiff was entitled to judgment against defendant Edward Kleffman for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant Edward Kleffman appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover upon a foreign judgment. Plaintiff had judgment in the court below, and defendant Edward Kleffman appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The facts are as follows: Heretofore plaintiff brought an action *404against defendants in the circuit court of the state of Wisconsin to recover damages for an alleged fraud committed by them in a transaction had between the parties which resulted in a sale of certain real property to plaintiff, which defendants falsely represented they owned. The summons therein was served upon this appellant, but not upon his codefendant. Appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sessions v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Crandall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Elliot v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
- Fleming v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Paquin v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Headline v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.