State v. Vesey
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for breaking and entering in violation of § 708.8, The Code. The sole question is whether the jury could find the testimony of an alleged accomplice was corroborated. We reverse because we do not find requisite corroborative evidence.
Defendant was charged with breaking and entering a Superamerica gas station in Indianola in the early morning of April 2, 1975. The State’s theory was that he aided and abetted Michael Edward Webb by acting as a lookout during the break-in. No issue is raised regarding the corpus delicti of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- State v. BizzettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. NeppleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State v. HorstmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. PollySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. WareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.