Holt v. State

RAMEY, Chief Justice.

The Appellant, John Robert Holt (“Holt”), after a plea of “not guilty,” was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated robbery. In the punishment phase the jury found the two enhancing offenses alleged in the indictment to be “true,” and assessed Holt’s punishment at confinement for eighty (80) years. Holt brings five points of error on appeal, assigning error only in the punishment phase. We will affirm the judgment.

Holt’s first three points of error 1 assert that the undisputed facts relating to the dates of commission and conviction for the two enhancing offenses…