Legal Opinion
In re G.H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 2002No. Nos. 00-FS-720, 00-FS-721, 00-FS-722PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On March 28, 2000, following a fact-finding hearing, the trial judge found that respondent S.H. was a neglected child within the meaning of D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(A)1 and (C) (1981),2 and that her brothers, G.H. and K.H., were neglected children within the meaning of § 16-2301(9)(C) and (E) (1981). The judge found that, while acting in loco parentis, H.C., the children’s mother’s live-in paramour, dragged twelve-year-old S.H. by her hair, ripping out sections of hair in two places, that he kicked her in or stepped on her back, and that several days later, he struck her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Fuller v. FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re K.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re A.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re Kya. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re J.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Petition of T.W.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.