Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Stearns

City of Dayton Municipal Court

Decided February 18, 1971No. 328199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A. BACKGROUND

Rice, J.

This cause came on to be heard upon the defendant’s supplemental motion for a new trial. The defendant was found guilty, by the court, of a violation of the city of Dayton ordinance relating to the second-hand automobile dealers licensing law (Section 655). A motion for new trial, submitted without case law or statutory authorities, was timely filed by the defendant and was overruled by the court. The defendant then filed this supplemental motion for a new trial, together with a memorandum, setting forth, for the first time, the authorities relied upon.

The question of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Niehaus v. State Ex Rel. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. City of Akron v. ScaleraOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. City of Columbus v. GlascockOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. C. L. Maier Co. v. Canton CityStark County Court of Common Pleas · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mr. Fireworks, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Valley View v. Rockside Hideaway Sanitary Landfill, Inc.Shaker Heights Municipal Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API