Carolina Music Co., Inc. v. Query
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
After a careful study of the record in this case, we are satisfied with the result of the Circuit Court decree, and direct that it be reported, omitting that portion thereof which deals with the position of appellants that the statute violates Article R Section 8, Subsection 3 of the Constitution of the United States, U. S. C. A. (folios 166-170).-This position has been abandoned by appellants.
The tax imposed by the statute attacked is more in the nature of a privilege tax than an occupational tax, though it partakes of both. And, of course, the tax attaches only to machines being operated —…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Massey v. GlennSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Roddey v. BYRNES, GOVERNORSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Edmonds v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Stephan v. State Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- City of Miami v. IC Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.