Legal Opinion

Oceana, Inc. v. Raimondo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 23, 2022No. 5:21-cv-05407Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 OCEANA, INC., Case No. 21-cv-05407-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 v. DENYING IN PART OCEANA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLETION 11 GINA RAIMONDO, et al., OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 25 13 14 In this action, plaintiff Oceana, Inc. (“Oceana”) challenges a final agency action, the 15 National Marine Fisheries Service’s (“NMFS”) approval of Amendment 18 to the Coastal Pelagic 16 Species Fisheries Management Plan. Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 1–12. Amendment 18 is a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Desert Survivors v. US Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. City of Duluth v. Kenneth Lee SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API