Legal Opinion
MUHMMAUD v. Murphy
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 30, 2009No. Prisoner Case 3:08-cv-01199 (VLB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #19]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Saleem Muhmmaud, commenced this action pro se against the defendants, Brian Murphy, Mary Marcial, Wayne Choinski, Fred Levesque, Ellen St. John, Major. Rose, Major Light, Major Rodriguez, Dennis Oglesby, Jeffrey McGill, CTO Brown, Counselor McEwan, Yolanda Ortero, John Sieminski, Captain Travaglin, James Dzurenda, and Counselor McLeod. The plaintiff asserts federal claims pursuant to the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments as well as several state constitutional claims.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Green v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Francis v. CarussoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Henry v. Hill-LillyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Jones v. BeckertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Jones v. BlekisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.