International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentBurger, Circuit Judge
I dissent because I think there is no occasion at this time for the court to reach the issue of the ultimate safety of the plant’s operations. The Commission has issued only a provisional permit to build a plant, not to operate it. The plant cannot go into operation until and unless the intervenor PRDC meets the safety provisions of the Act.
The sole basis of challenge to the provisional construction permit is that the future possibility that an operating permit will be unlawfully and improperly issued by the Commission creates a “present,” “immediate” and “unavoidable threat” of injury. I do…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Associated-Banning Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Community Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960