Legal Opinion
Barrett v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 20, 2013No. 3:11cv1121 (SRU)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
On July 5, 2011, Marc Barrett (“Barrett” or “the petitioner”), acting pro se, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. # 1), challenging the legality of the sentence imposed on him over two and a half years earlier on September 30, 2008. On October 13, 2011, I ordered that Barrett show cause within thirty days why the motion should not be dismissed as untimely under the one-year limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). Barrett failed to do so within the time allotted,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Alixcair Valverde v. James Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Allevato v. HowardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Box v. LilleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Coleman v. MelecioDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Danielson v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.