Legal Opinion
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 1953No. 49 C 1071PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
The government has filed its motion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice as to thirty-six named defendants pursuant to Rule 21 and Rule 41(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The issue before the court is whether the court should allow the dismissal without prejudice. The defendants urge that the dismissal, if any, should be with prejudice for the following reasons:(1) that such a dismissal would irreparably harm and effect the defense which these defendants would be called upon to make should a second suit be brought against them in that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Ockert v. Union Barge Line Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Bolten v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Robert W. Johnston v. H. G. Cartwright, Kiowa Corporation, Walter Brown and H. G. Cartwright v. Robert W. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Grivas v. Parmelee Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Catucci v. PachecoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.