People v. Blasingame
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
O’Connor, J. (dissenting).
I would have no difficulty at all with the position taken by the majority if the issue they apparently wish to resolve were presented by the facts of the case. I am in full agreement with the position that a defendant may not be questioned after arraignment in the absence of counsel and that he may not waive the right to counsel in *461the absence of counsel (see, e.g., People v Torres, 63 AD2d 1033). It is both reasonable and proper to extend this rule to a situation where a defendant is in the process of obtaining counsel after arraignment. These principles, aimed at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. KayeNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.