Blitch v. Sapp

This is an action of ejectment. Plaintiffs filed their declarations (two suits consolidated) and the defendant filed his pleas, including one of “not guilty.” Pursuant to answers to interrogatories propounded by defendant the plaintiffs were relying on: (1) prior possession, (2) prior possession of predecessor in title and (3) legal title.

The cause came on to be tried before a jury; and after the evidence for both parties was before them, together with the court’s instructions as to the law in' the case, they returned a verdict for the defendant.

Plaintiffs assign as error certain charges of…