Legal Opinion

Katzenstein v. Reid, Murdock & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Seeligson.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit by. appellees against appellant instituted to recover a balance of $1,038.68 due on an account for merchandise sold by appellees to appellant. It was alleged in the petition that from September, 1903, and up to and including November 27, 1903, appellant was insolvent and that while so insolvent he falsely represented to appellees, and to certain mercantile agencies, that he was solvent and had assets largely in excess of his debts and liabilities, and that appellees relying on such representations were thereby induced to sell appellant the merchandise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eaton, Cole Burnham Co. v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Gainesville National Bank v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Morrison, Herriman & Co. v. Adoue & LobitTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Talcott v. FriendCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
  3. Waggoner v. ZundelowitzTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. California State Board of Equalization v. Coast Radio ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Yellow Creek Logging Corp. v. DareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API