Legal Opinion

Scioto Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Price Waterhouse

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 94-409Published

1ConcurrenceCook, J.

I concur with the judgment of the majority but dissent from the syllabus. Primarily, my disagreement is with the concept that any negligence of a client, whether or not it directly interferes with the accountant’s performance, can reduce the client’s recovery. I would hold, instead, that comparative negligence may be applied only to negligent acts of a client that contribute to the accountant’s failure to perform according to the standards of the accounting profession. Other negligence by the client, such as the claimed negligence of Scioto here, is to be considered in the context of whether…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fish v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API