Van Alstyne v. Wimple
New York Supreme Court
This cause had been commenced in this Court, but was, pursuant to agreement of the parties, submitted to arbitrators by a general submission of all matters in difference : J ° _ _ . _ - . __r. . and the arbitrators had {inter aha) awarded that Wimple should pay to Tan Alstyne the costs of this suit, ¿o be taxed. Tan Alstyne had procured them to be taxed by a commissioner ex parte, and without notice to Wimple.
1Opinion of the Court
Curia.
By the submission of these parties without a rule, the cause is out of Court; and there is no provision that it should be made a rule. Without saying whether the taxation can have any effect, it is clearly not such an official one as will shut out all inquiry at the Circuit, in an action upon the bond or award. The submission deprives us of summary jurisdiction over the costs. The right of taxation, as between attorney and client, stands upon a different ground, viz. the power of the Court over their own officers, The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.(a)
Chapman v. Lansdown, (1 Anstr.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Theofano Maritime Co. v. 9,551.19 Long Tons of Chrome Ore on Board the AliakmonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
- Uneeda-Hempstead, Inc. v. Bilt Well Contracting Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1938