Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. George Washington Cemetery, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 1964No. [No. 204, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After the remand in the earlier case of Feinberg v. Geo. Wash. Cemetery, 226 Md. 393, a jury brought in a verdict for the plaintiff. On motion for judgment N.O.V. or in the alternative for a new trial, the court denied the motion for judgment N.O.V. but granted a new trial. Since there is no final judgment to appeal from, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. Snyder v. Cearfoss, 186 Md. 360, 366; Code (1957), Art. 5, sec. 1. In the absence of a final judgment there can be no review of the ruling on the motion N.O.V. Sears v. B. & O. Railroad, 219 Md. 118, 122.

Appeal dismissed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Sears v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Feinberg v. George Washington Cemetery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Albert W. Sisk & Son, Inc. v. Friendship Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Dabrowski v. DondalskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Nu Car Carriers, Inc. v. EverettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Dabrowski v. DondalskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API