Legal Opinion

J. C. Millett Co. v. Latchford-Marble Glass Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1956No. Civ. 16819PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This is an appeal by the corporate and individual defendants from an order denying their motions for a change of venue.

The action was brought in San Francisco by a San Francisco corporation and partnership against three corporate and eight individual defendants. The action is for breach of contract and an accounting, the contract having been executed in 1950 between the Latchford-Marble Glass Company as seller and the plaintiffs as buyers, whereby the seller agreed to furnish the buyers with beverage bottles, and to give the buyers the exclusive right, with certain exceptions, to market such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Konig v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Chase v. South Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mosby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Shida v. Japan Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. J. C. Millett Co. v. Latchford-Marble Glass Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Smith v. Stanford Research InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API