Legal Opinion

Beckett v. Regan

Hamilton Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1896Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Substantially the error assigned in this case is, that the court of ■ common pleas erred in sustaining a demurrer to an answer filed by Mr. Mason, one of the defendants in the original action, and in rendering a judgment for the amount sued for, against her and her codefendants.

The'petition of John Regan was filed against Beckett & Healy, as parrtners under the firm name of The Central Transfer Co., Mary A. Me Fee and Catharine Mason. It averred that he was the owner and holder of a promissory note (of which a copy was set out), dated April 15, 1891, made by the Central Transfer company, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Compton v. TaborSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API