Legal Opinion

Ag Processing, Inc. v. KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2012No. WD 74601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

This appeal arises from the Missouri Public Service Commission’s (“Commission”) order requiring KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Company (“KCP & L”) to pay customer refunds because it failed to prove that a natural gas hedging program was operated prudently. KCP & L contends the order is unlawful because the Commission incorrectly applied the burden of proof.1 We agree. For reasons *513explained herein, we reverse the Commission’s order and remand the cause for further consideration.

Factual and Procedural History

KCP & L is the successor company to Aquila, Inc., which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Askins v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. GS Technologies Operating Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State ex rel. Associated Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Office of Public CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. AG Processing, Inc. v. KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. AG Processing, Inc. v. KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company Missouri Public Service Commission Triumph Foods, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In the Matter of the Request for an Increase in Sewer Operating Revenues of Emerald Pointe Utility Company Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Office of Public CounselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API