Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Patillo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1948No. 6 Div. 758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

This petition for certiorari is due to be stricken for failure of observance of Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Ex parte Anderson, post, p. 32, 36 So.2d 244. It is so ordered.

Petition for writ of certiorari stricken.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duckett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Bates v. General Steel Tank Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. KorneghySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Stovall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Hochman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API