Legal Opinion

Trimble v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2003No. 03-3568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Phillip Trimble seeks review of a final order by the Secretary for the United States Department of Agriculture issued on March 27, 2003, under the Horse Protection Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1821-31. The parties have waived oral argument and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. 34(a).

On February 4, 2002, Bobby Acord, Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, an agency of the Department of Agriculture, filed a complaint charging Trimble with violating the Horse Protection Act. The complaint alleged that Trimble was the trainer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. DePiero v. City of MacedoniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. William Earl Bobo Jack Mitchell v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Pfahler v. Natl Latex ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API