Legal Opinion

County of Erie v. Baltz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Caroline Houck and others, as surviving executors, etc., and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 9th day of October, 1907, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Erie Special Term, overruling the said defendants’ demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Kruse, J.:

The undertaking given for the faithful discharge of the duties of the defendant Baltz, as county treasurer of Erie county, is a several as well as joint obligation. The rule, therefore, that in actions against the personal representatives of a deceased joint debtor, it must be alleged and proved that the debt cannot be collected against the surviving joint debtors, has no application to this case. That and the other questions in this case are fully discussed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Williams, and with the views expressed therein we all agree save in one respect. We differ over…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. German American Coffee Co. v. O'NeilNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Seligman v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Sisto v. BambaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Pruett v. CaddiganNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lane v. FennNew York Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API