Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935No. Civil No. 3492Published

1Concurrence

McALISTER, Judge,

Concurring Specially. — I concur in the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, but desire to give an additional reason for this view.

It is the contention of appellants that the orders of the trial court approving the settlement of the claims of the estates against the appellee, the Central Arizona Light & Power Company, for the damages suffered by these estates as a result of the deaths of the decedents were void on their face, because they state that the appellant admitted liability in the sum of $8,500 and agreed with the administratrix to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jennings v. ListerArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. DoeArizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API