Legal Opinion

Ricardo Chacon v. Robert Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 2021No. 18-71515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICARDO CHACON, No. 18-71515 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A094-766-759 ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 19, 2020 * San Francisco, California Filed February 18, 2021 Before: Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Andrew D. Hurwitz, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bress * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 CHACON V.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Genovevo Alvarez Ronquillo v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  3. Owens v. The Oregon Clinic, P.C.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API