Legal Opinion

Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. Shockley

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 2002No. 2081, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County involves the conflict between a public employer’s right to insist that its employees answer questions relating to their fitness for public service and the employees’ right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination. The Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (“Department”), appellant, asks us to hold that it was entitled to discipline a correctional officer who refused to cooperate in an investigation of his off duty activities. Appellant presents two questions for our review:

I. Did the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ocean City Police Department v. MarshallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. 110OAG3, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  3. In re: Misc. 4281Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG003, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API