Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. Shockley
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County involves the conflict between a public employer’s right to insist that its employees answer questions relating to their fitness for public service and the employees’ right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination. The Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (“Department”), appellant, asks us to hold that it was entitled to discipline a correctional officer who refused to cooperate in an investigation of his off duty activities. Appellant presents two questions for our review:
I. Did the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ocean City Police Department v. MarshallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- 110OAG3, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
- In re: Misc. 4281Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG003, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025