Legal Opinion

Bagarozy v. Callas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed and the motion to set aside and vacate the ex parte order directing the examination of the third-party appellant-respondent granted, with $20 costs and disbursements to the third-party appellant, and the cross appeal of plaintiffs, having become moot, hereby is dismissed. On these papers there is no showing that there is reason to suspect that the third party has made an untrue certificate or failed fully to set forth the facts required to be shown by section 918 of the Civil Practice Act. The statute does not authorize examinations in order to provide information…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heller Financial, Inc. v. Wall Street Imports, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API