Legal Opinion
Silverstein v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract. The case is before us on two forms of procedure, one a bill of exceptions to a ruling of the Superior Court on a motion there made to dismiss the case for want of prosecution, the other a motion made in this court to dismiss the report of the judge of the Superior Court because it was not seasonably entered here.
1. The bill of exceptions is considered first. Verdict for the defendant was rendered on January 8, 1924. After intervening proceedings, which need not be recited, the judge filed a report of the case to the full bench on December 17, 1924. No further…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffin v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Jarvis v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Priest v. Inhabitants of GrotonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Hellier v. LoringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Loonie v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. SweeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Silverstein v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Gora v. Neapolitan Ice Cream Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Charbonneau v. GuilletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.