Azrak v. State

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant was informed against, tried before a jury and convicted of a crime of bribery as set forth in § 838.011, Fla.Stat. 1963, F.S.A.1 This appeal is from the judg*713ment and sentence entered pursuant to the jury verdict.

The appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. The facts necessary for a decision are'as follows: The appellant was a businessman against whom numerous complaints had been received by the Better Business Division of the Miami Chamber of Commerce, the Better Business Bureau of Greater Miami, the State Attorney’s…