Legal Opinion
In Re Gurr
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 1, 1996No. Bankruptcy B-94-06134 PHX JMMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
JAMES M. MARLAR, Bankruptcy Judge.
March 14, 1996, the debtor, through counsel, filed a Motion For New Trial with respect to the court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Ruling denying confirmation of the debtor’s amended and modified plan. The court has considered the pleadings and now rules.
As a threshold matter, the plaintiff’s motion is properly characterized as a motion to alter the prior order. Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e), made applicable here by Fed. R.Bankr.P. 9023, a judgment may be altered or amended if: (1) there was a manifest error of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Export Group Emilio Figueroa Jack Andrews v. Reef Industries, Inc., and Mexican Coffee InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Sam E. Brown and Erma Jean Brown v. Freeman WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Philadelphia Life Insurance v. Proudfoot (In Re Proudfoot)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- West v. CostenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Profit v. Savage (In Re Profit)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2012