Max Abecassis v. Eugene M. Cummings, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-Appellants Nissim Corporation and Max Abecassis (collectively “Nissim”) appeal the dismissal of their complaint for failure to state a claim against Defendants-Appellees Joseph M. Vanek and Eugene M. Cummings, P.C. (collectively “Vanek and Cummings”). After reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of dismissal.
I
In January 1998, Nissim retained Vanek and Cummings as counsel to “enhance, defend, and enforce” certain U.S. patents owned by Nissim. [Retainer Agreement, R. 1 (Exh. A) at 1.] The parties entered into a Retainer Agreement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Wilchombe v. TeeVee Toons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Speaker v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Disease Control & PreventionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Rivell v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.