People v. Runnion
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment following conviction by jury of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (b)) and personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 1203.06, subd. (a)(1), 12022.5, subd. (a).) Defendant alleges the court’s instruction that the word “firearm” includes “handgun” violated due process by removing a necessary element of the use clause from the jury’s consideration and amounted to a directed verdict as to that element. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm.
Statement of Facts
Around 11:30 p.m. on March 3, 1993, defendant went into a 7-Eleven…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. CarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Medley v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- People v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Thacker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.