Legal Opinion

People v. Runnion

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1994No. A063697PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment following conviction by jury of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (b)) and personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 1203.06, subd. (a)(1), 12022.5, subd. (a).) Defendant alleges the court’s instruction that the word “firearm” includes “handgun” violated due process by removing a necessary element of the use clause from the jury’s consideration and amounted to a directed verdict as to that element. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm.

Statement of Facts

Around 11:30 p.m. on March 3, 1993, defendant went into a 7-Eleven…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. CarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Medley v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. People v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Thacker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API