Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skuey v. Bjerkan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1928No. 26,044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentStone, J.

I agree that G. S. 1923, § 4288, imposes a duty to insure the entire risk unless the employer be exempted by the industrial commission. The section is directed, it seems to me, wholly at the insured and not at all at the insurer. To start with, it provides that “every employer” shall insure unless “such employer” be exempted by the commission. There follows a proviso that “any employer,” with the approval of the commission, may exclude the medical and hospital benefits required by another section. Another proviso is that “an employer” conducting distinct operations or establishments may…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Skuey v. BjerkanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API