Legal Opinion

Sibly v. Hood

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cooper county.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Girk, C. J.

This was an aetion of detinue brought by Sibly against Hood for three slaves. The plaintiff had judgment. The bill of exceptions shows that about the year 1821, Sibly entered into partnership with one Boggs, and one Bales,'-with a view to trade with the Osage Indians and others The terms of the partnership were, that Sibly was to furnish the capital and goods that were to go in trade. That he took on himself individually and agreed with the partners, that he would be individually responsible to the U. S. for the payment of the outfit of goods. It was further agreed that Boggs and Bales should…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Claflin v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  2. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Pennington v. MeeksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Burns v. BangertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Calihan v. PowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API