Legal Opinion

Tejon v. Broome

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 28, 1972No. 71-5PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

At the time of the accident, Mary Broome did not appear to have suffered injury. She complained the next day of a pain in the neck and consulted an ortho-paedic physician who treated her for pain for several months, but who did not testify at the trial. She then switched to a chiropractor, who did testify. The defendants had her examined by a second ortho-paedist, whose testimony would support a finding by the jury that she had not suffered injury as a consequence of the accident. The jury returned a verdict for Mr. Broome which compensated him almost exactly for property damage…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Griffis v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Shaw v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Laskey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Higbee v. DorigoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. OstrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Cowart v. Kendall United Methodist ChurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Parris v. James Anthony GavaganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Santa Fe Development Corp. v. RandolphDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Frazier v. MerricksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API