Tejon v. Broome
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MANN, Judge.
At the time of the accident, Mary Broome did not appear to have suffered injury. She complained the next day of a pain in the neck and consulted an ortho-paedic physician who treated her for pain for several months, but who did not testify at the trial. She then switched to a chiropractor, who did testify. The defendants had her examined by a second ortho-paedist, whose testimony would support a finding by the jury that she had not suffered injury as a consequence of the accident. The jury returned a verdict for Mr. Broome which compensated him almost exactly for property damage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Griffis v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Shaw v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Laskey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Higbee v. DorigoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phillips v. OstrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Cowart v. Kendall United Methodist ChurchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Parris v. James Anthony GavaganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Santa Fe Development Corp. v. RandolphDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Frazier v. MerricksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.