Legal Opinion
Adcock v. Van Norman
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 2005No. 2002-CT-02027-SCTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
917 So.2d 86 (2005)
Pamala Ann Standish ADCOCK
v.
Christopher Alan VAN NORMAN.
No. 2002-CT-02027-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
December 15, 2005.
Patricia Peterson Smith, attorney for appellant.
Sarah A. Hodnett Brooks, Rolling Fork, attorney for appellee.
EN BANC.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
WALLER, Presiding Justice, for the Court.
¶ 1. Pamala Ann Standish Adcock and Christopher Alan Van Norman appeal a chancellor's judgment on a petition for custody and a petition for paternity. The chancellor granted Pamala permanent custody of the children, denied Christopher's petition for custody and denied…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Benton ex rel. Brand v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
- Benton ex rel. Brand v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
- Cotton v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012