Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Soto

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984No. L.A. 31678Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.3d 483 (1984)

674 P.2d 750

198 Cal. Rptr. 779

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ENRIQUE ALVAREZ SOTO, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 31678.

Supreme Court of California.

January 30, 1984.

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp and Robert H. Philibosian, District Attorneys, Harry B. Sondheim, Donald J. Kaplan and Sterling S. Suga, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Donald N. Stahl, District Attorney (Stanislaus), John Replogle, Deputy District Attorney, John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Daniel J. Kremer, Chief Assistant Attorney General, S. Clark Moore,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API