Legal Opinion
Interscope Records v. DOES 1-7
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 12, 2007No. Civil Action 4:07cv52PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
KELLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ ex parte Motion for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery. (Docket No. 3). Plaintiffs move to serve a subpoena on the College of William and Mary (the “College”) in Williamsburg, Virginia to discover information about each of the unknown Doe defendants.
Plaintiffs allege that the seven Doe defendants utilized the internet service provided to them by the College to access an online media distribution system for the purpose of downloading and distributing plaintiffs’ copyrighted works. The copyrighted material was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Recording Industry Ass'n of America v. University of North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. John Does 1-37District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- In Re Does 1-10, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Career Counseling, Inc. v. Amerifactors Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Vincent Mummau, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
- in Re: Does 1-10, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007