Legal Opinion

State v. Baxter

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided May 14, 1913Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

The charge made by the indictment is that Frank E.- Baxter was at the time of the acts charged and until March, 1913, the duly 'appointed, qualified and acting superintendent of banks for the state of Ohio; that said Baxter as such officer of the state took charge of the affairs and assets o.f the Columbus Savings -& Trust Company, and appointed as special deputy superintendent one Daniel H. Sowers to assist in the liquidation and distribution of the assets of that company; that all the property and assets of that bank came into the care, custody and control of the said Baxter as- such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. State v. TrolsonNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. United States v. GreveDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1894
  5. Chaplin v. LeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API