State v. Baxter
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.
The charge made by the indictment is that Frank E.- Baxter was at the time of the acts charged and until March, 1913, the duly 'appointed, qualified and acting superintendent of banks for the state of Ohio; that said Baxter as such officer of the state took charge of the affairs and assets o.f the Columbus Savings -& Trust Company, and appointed as special deputy superintendent one Daniel H. Sowers to assist in the liquidation and distribution of the assets of that company; that all the property and assets of that bank came into the care, custody and control of the said Baxter as- such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- State v. TrolsonNevada Supreme Court · 1893
- Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- United States v. GreveDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1894
- Chaplin v. LeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.