Rish v. THEO BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining the demurrers of respondent St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company to three complaints asking for recovery on a payment bond. The parties have agreed that the actions be consolidated for appeal. The question is whether rented construction equipment is “materials” under the bond. We find it is not and affirm the lower court.
For the purposes of the demurrers, it was accepted as true that each appellant rented construction equipment to Theo Bros. Construction Company for that company’s use in a contract with the South Carolina State…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fuller v. S. C. Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Hines v. Hendricks Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Garco Indus. Equipment Co., Inc. v. MalloryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Morrow Crane Co. v. T. R. Tucker Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Hardin Construction Group, Inc. v. Carlisle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Syro Steel Co. v. EAGLE CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995