Legal Opinion

United States v. Ferro

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 22, 1954No. Crim. A. No. 9024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

In this wagering tax prosecution, defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that the purchase of the Special Tax Stamp within the month during which he commenced business is compliance with the Act, relying on Farmer v. U. S., 10 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 970.

The Farmer case, however, is a retail liquor dealer tax case, to which 26 U.S.C. § 3272, permitting payment by the end of the month of starting business is applicable.

26 U.S.C. § 3292, however, applies sections 3271, 3273(a), 3275, 3276, 3277, 3279 and 3280 to the Wagering Tax, but specifically provides that no other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices & ContentsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  2. United States v. BalistrieriDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API