Legal Opinion

Guzman v. Irmadan, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 10, 2008No. 07-23289-CIVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DISCOVERY

STEPHEN T. BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER came before the Court sua sponte. In order to efficiently resolve this matter, the Parties are instructed as follows.

The following rules apply to discovery objections before this Court:

I. Vague, Overly Broad and Unduly Burdensome:

Parties shall not make nonspecific, boilerplate objections. Such objections do not comply with Local Rule 26.1 G 3(a) which provides “Where an objection is made to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof or to any document request under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34, the objection shall state with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sánchez-Medina v. Unicco Service Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  2. Adelman v. Boy Scouts of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  3. Ree v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  4. Burrell v. DuhonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. In re Oxbow Carbon LLC Unitholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API