Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Schlotfelt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 26, 1951No. 4-9425PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The question presented by this appeal is the manner of reinvesting funds from the proceeds of certain United States Savings Bonds (now due) issued in the name of co-owners, one of whom is now incompe-' tent and under guardianship.
The facts are not in dispute. The parties stipulated that on January 12, 1949, Samuel H. Wilson (now 89 years of age) was declared incompetent and Baylor House duly appointed guardian. House died May 20, 1949, and appellant, S. Y. Taylor, was appointed guardian in succession.
It was further stipulated: “Description of Bonds— No. D159738D — -Date, Dec. 1939, Issued to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Myers v. Hardin, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roman v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- McKinney v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Morris v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re the Estate of Howard D. Smith, Shaun Murray v. Jennie C. Smith, Individually and as Conservator for Howard D. Smith and Western Surety Co., ManufacturerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Roman v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958