Legal Opinion

Creditors Adjustment Bureau v. Imani

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 2022No. B316546Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/9/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT 2d Civil No. B316546 BUREAU, INC., (Super. Ct. No. 56-2013- 00438287-CU-BA-VTA) Plaintiff, Cross-defendant (Ventura County) and Respondent, v. RAY IMANI, Defendant, Cross- complainant and Appellant. Over twenty five years ago, we stated the unremarkable: “The purpose of the law of contracts is to protect the reasonable expectations of the parties . . . . There is . . . a price to be paid for breach of contract.” (Ben-Zvi v. Edmar Co. (1995) 40…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Ben-Zvi v. Edmar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Greentree Financial Group, Inc. v. Execute Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API