Legal Opinion

Lawton v. City of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1966No. 11406PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

Earl L. Dolifka, J. E. Berryman and Leonard Lawton, appellants, by an amended pleading sued the City of Austin, Safeway Stores, Inc., Nash Phillips, Clyde Copus and R. B. Lewis for a declaratory judgment invalidating three ordinances passed by the City of Austin making changes in its zoning ordinances.

Trial was non-jury. Judgment was rendered declaring the ordinances attacked to be valid and denying appellants any relief, the Court reciting “that plaintiffs have failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the enactment of” the ordinances by the City “has had or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Bolton v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bauss v. Plymouth TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. T & R Associates., Inc. v. City of Amarillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  3. James v. City of Round RockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Charlestown Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. LaCokeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Charles L. Myers v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API