Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Schultz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided February 5, 1923No. 93Published

1Opinion of the Court

Reno, J.,

On Dec. 17, 1919, defendant executed a sealed instrument called an “employee’s statement,” directed to plaintiff, the pertinent provisions of which follow:

“The undersigned hereby agrees that you may indemnify the employer hereinafter named in any amount the employer may desire in favor of Railway Audit and Inspection Co. (employer) to such extent and in such form as may be agreed upon between you and the employer in respect of the acts of the undersigned in said employer’s service as inspector at Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania, or in any other position in the employer’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Young v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Wilson v. WernwagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Bole v. New Hampshire Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API